Day 24 M 18 Nov – CRITIQUE OF FINAL DELIVERABLE STORYBOARD/WIREFRAME + WORK SESSION

DAY 24 M 18 NOV                                  AW V. 1.0, 073013

< Day 23      Day 25 >

CRITIQUE OF FINAL DELIVERABLE STORYBOARD/WIREFRAME + WORK SESSION

“To quote or not to quote. Therein lies plagiarism.”          

– Anon.

“Stealing from one source is plagiarism. Stealing from many sources is research”

– Laurendo Almeida

DRIVING QUESTIONS:

1. Where is your project today?

2. What do others see in your project?

3. Where would you like your project to be?

4. What is your plan to getting there?

SCHEDULE

4:30-5:00pm: TEAM 1 discussion

5:00 – 5:30pm: TEAM 2 discussion

5:30 – 6:00pm: TEAM 3 discussion

6:00-6:10pm: break

6:10-7:00pm: Present, discuss next assignment

ASSIGNMENT 24: Prepare Final Storyboard/Wireframe for FINAL DELIVERABLE – to include as a minimum:

1. A WEB PRESENTATION of your LIFE2050PGH3.0 SCENARIOS. This is a top level summary with links to deeper detailed content, references, sources, etc. As a minimum, this presentation should include:

INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY & OUTLINE: in the form of a navigable menu

TOPSIGHT: A VISION STATEMENT: explaining why you selected your FOCUS DOMAIN (i.e.: LEARN, SHARE, OPPORTUNITY) and how it is salient for LIFE2050 in PGH3.0.

INSIGHT: EXPEDITIONARY TREK INSIGHTS: from observations and interviews in your neighborhood.

FARSIGHT: 2013 WEAK SIGNALS/FUTURE SIGNS: drawn from your exploration of myriad CMU and Pittsburgh city and regional initiatives, organizations, plans, programs, labs, centers, startups, accelerators, incubators, etc. – introduced to you all throughout this semester.

FORESIGHT:

– GLOBAL BENCHMARK GOALS:  relevant to your Focus Domain. These LONG HORIZON GOALS should be drawn from sources like WBCSD, IFTF, OECD, UN Millennial Goals, Green Denmark, NMC Horizon Reports, CSPC, GBN, FFF, IFF, Alternative Worlds Global Trends, The Singularity, etc., etc. (Go back and refresh your memory about all the references, especially from Days 2, 3 & 4).

– 2050 LOCAL BENCHMARK GOALS: for your LOCUS NEIGHBORHOOD – with special emphasis on those LOCAL BENCHMARK GOALS that map onto and help advance GLOBAL BENCHMARK GOALS.

– STRATEGIC PATHWAYS MAP: showing the FORCE OF CHANGE PATHWAYS leading decade by decade from WEAK SIGNALS/FUTURE SIGNS to your 2050 BENCHMARK GOALS

– FUTURE PERSONAS SCENARIOS: Your VISION SCENARIOS illustrating OPPORTUNITIES FOR LIFE2050 – narrated through the FIRST-PERSON EXPERIENCES of  your PERSONAS – these narratives illustrate your awareness of how 2013 WEAK SIGNALS/EARLY SIGNS could play out along STRATEGIC PATHWAYS OF CHANGE to achieve LOCAL BENCHMARK GOALS that in turn help advance GLOBAL BENCHMARK GOALS

2. A 20-MINUTE VERBAL & VISUAL PRESENTATION TO AN AUDIENCE

REFLECTION 36

DESIGN FOR IMPACT: VIRTUOUS OR “PIOUS?”

” Design virtue increases as the square of the distance from home ”          

– A. Wasserman axiom

DRIVING QUESTIONS:

1. Is social/humanitarian design the new imperialism?

2. What are your thoughts about the Bruce Nussbaum – Emily Pilliton debate? About Philips Humanitarian Design? About Tech Philanthropy?

2. How do we move from Design For – to Design With – to Design By the User?

REFERENCE & RESOURCES  For further exploration TBD

STUDENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES:

Measurable or Observable Knowledge, Skills, Attributes, Ability to Apply, Interpret, Create, Design, Explain, etc. TBD

 

 NOTES

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s